Investigating the Evolution of the Political Theory of Imam Khomeini (R.A.) with the Lakatos Methodology Approach

Document Type: Original Article

Abstract

In this article, Imam Khomeini’s political theory is investigated with the Lakatos methodology. His methodology confirms the distinction between a hard core or the original skeleton of investments and experimental propositions confirms as a protective belt for the research program. Regarding this, the claim from this article is that if we understand the system of religious knowledge of Imam Khomeini (R.A.) under the pattern of Lakatos, then the position of political wisdom in this system will be placed at the hard core or the original skeleton. The reason is that “There is a strong ratio of Imam Khomeini (R.A.), among the strains of religious knowledge in the practical system is established”.

Highlights

1

Keywords


Chalmers, Alan Francle (1982), What Is This Thing Called Science? An assessment of the nature and status of Science and Methods, 2nd Ed, The Open University press

 

Fanaei Ashkevari, Mohammad (1995), Religious Epistemology, Tehran, Book Publishing

 

Feyrahi, Dawood (2001), Political and Governmental System in Islam (3), Political Science Quarterly, Bagher Al-Ulum University, 2001, No. 16

 

Ghazizadeh, Kazem (1998), Imam Khomeini's Political-Judicial Thought, Presidential Strategic Research Center

 

Hossein Zadeh (2006), an Introduction to Epistemology and Fundamentals of Religious Knowledge, Qom, Imam Khomeini Institute

 

Kadivar, Mohsen (1997), Government theories in Shiite jurisprudence, Ney publication

 

Khomeini, Roohollah (1987), Sahifeh Noor (Volume 20 and 21), Publishing and Printing Organization of the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance

 

Khosropanah, Abdolhossein (2002), New Word, Qom, Qom Seminary Studies Center

 

Lakatos, Imre (1968), "Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs", in J. Worrall and Currie (Eds.), The Methodology of Scientific research Programs, Philosophical papers, volume1, Cambridge University Press

 

Lakatos, Imre (1972), "why did Copernicus's Research Programme Supersede Ptolemy’s", in J. Worrall and Currie (Eds.), The Methodology of Scientific research Programs, Philosophical papers, volume1, Cambridge University Press

 

Naji Sa'id, (2009), "A Critique on the Methodology of Lakatos Scientific Research Programs", Metaphysics (Scientific-Research), No. 1 & 2, spring and summer, 63-80

 

 

Naraghi, Mullah Ahmad (1996), Avaedalayam, Islamic Propaganda Office of Qom Seminary

 

Nickels, Tomas (2000), "Lakatos", In W. H. Newton-Smith (Ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of science, Blackwell Companions to Philosophy, Blackwell publishers

 

Popper, Karl R. (1989), Conjectures and Refutation, Rutledge Press

 

Popper, Karl R. (1992), the Logic of Scientific Discovery, Rutledge Press

 

 

Soroush, Abdolkarim (1991), Bill and Theoretical Expansion of Sharia, Tehran, Sara'at

 

Suzanchi, Hossein (2009), Meaning, Possibilities and Solutions for the Realization of Religious Science, Research Institute for Cultural and Social Studies

 

W. H. Newton-Smith (1981), the Rationality of Science, Rutledge Press